Health Motivation Theory – Testing the Reliability of the Concept

health motivation

According to the present research, the term “health motivation” can be described as the ability to acquire and maintain a desirable state in response to negative consequences and pressures. The present research offered a theoretical framework and a particular definition of health motivation which include four stages: formation of health motivation, development of health motivation attitude, organization of health motivation, and persistent pursuit of health goals. These four steps are adopted to describe the processes by which people come to have a state of health motivation. The present study is designed to provide health professionals and other health experts with new perspectives regarding health motivation.

The Framework

A girl sitting on a bench

The present study was motivated by the need to provide health professionals with a framework to understand and treat the whole person; therefore, each of the four steps was conceptualized to address different aspects of health motivation. The process of developing health motivation was divided into four components, which were (a) identifying the reasons for wanting to modify behavior and choose behavior, (b) analyzing the individual’s taste for change, (c) creating an environment that encourages health improvement, (d) applying external resources to improve health, and (e) providing support and resources to facilitate the process. The process of developing health motivation was analyzed within four components. These four components included (a) understanding the reason for wanting to modify behavior, (b) assessing the individual’s taste for change, (c) creating an environment that promotes health improvement, (d) providing support and resources to facilitate the process, and (e) providing information on how to develop and maintain health.

The Concept

A person holding a pole

As part of the process for validating the concept of health motivation, we developed a series of seven items that we assessed from persons’ answers. The seven items were: satisfaction with health behaviors, how much the person liked the way he or she looked, satisfaction with health behaviors, importance of relationships, the impact of health behaviors on the quality of life, and the ability to make changes. In addition, we developed scales that evaluated each item in terms of its relationship to four other aspects of the individual’s life: social activities, emotional well-being, self-image, and social connections. For each item we asked the following question: “Do you agree or disagree that having these characteristics would help you in your quest for health?” In addition, we also asked the following questions: “If you had to select just one quality to improve the quality of your life, what would it be?”

The Development

After developing the initial concept for a healthy lifestyle, we conducted a parallel analysis using data from the NLSY surveys. In a parallel analysis, we examined how different health behaviors, changes in cultural values, and life events related to the development of different personality characteristics. These were: childhood gender identity, parental socioeconomic status, racial/ethnic background, and parent marriage history. We categorized the items on the basis of their association to the four components described above. The resulting sample comprised NLSY adults with a total of 59 respondents.

The Outcome

The primary outcome measurement tool was the CSHM-Q. The CSHM-Q is a brief, multiple-item questionnaire that measures key personal beliefs, expectations, beliefs, and behaviors related to health and the promotion of a healthy lifestyle. The C SHM-Q has strong psychometric properties. First, it is easy to use it effectively. Second, it provides accurate estimates of key psychological characteristics of the respondent.

The Tools

The second important outcome measurement tool was the CSHM-Q. The CSHM-Q consists of a series of brief scales that measure five different aspects of health motivation to maintain a healthy lifestyle. These scales were used to construct a composite health motivation scale. The full C SHM-Q test included a battery of psychological tests that assess general mental health, social support from peers, self-image and self-esteem, mental health functioning, bodily health, and physical health.

The Interpretation

The study also included two independent sets of items that create four content validity dimensions that reflect four aspects of motivation. The first content validity dimension focused on the construct validity of the items’ relevance to people’s lives and goals. The second dimension focused on the item’s internal consistency with the original concept and the third dimension focused on the reliability of the item.

The research also tested the reliability of the SDTs’ content and structure.

Wrapping Up

Specifically, the SDTs’ item descriptions were analyzed using a criterion-based approach using a 5-pronged approach, while the items’ codes were analyzed using a principal components approach. This ensured that the coding and SDT construction were reliable and consistent. Finally, the reliability of the health self-determination theory was checked by conducting a replication of the original study using a different sampling design, using the same procedure as the original study and controlling for the same variables.

Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter